NSA Partners with Texas-Based Hispanic Serving Institution

Source: National Security Agency NSA

NSA has a long history of establishing research partnerships with universities, non-profits and industry, but it reached a new milestone in 2024.

The Office of Research and Technology Applications (ORTA) recently established a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) with the University of Texas Permian Basin (UTPB), making them the first Hispanic-Serving Institution to join the Advancing Research Innovating Solutions through Engagement (ARISE) CRADA.

As part of this agreement, UTPB students and faculty will have the opportunity to work directly with NSA researchers and liaisons on unclassified mission problems. According to ORTA deputy director said Karen Presley, this new partnership is a step forward in increasing representation of diverse students into the program.

“Diversity brings different talent, experiences, and skill sets to NSA which can lead to innovative ways of approaching problems,” Presley said. “This is a win-win for both the universities and the Agency.”

ARISE provides collaborative research opportunities to diverse, underrepresented student populations and faculty. According to Presley, it also supports NSA’s efforts to build and sustain a diverse, expert workforce that continues to provide the Nation with competitive advantages.
Presley first connected with Brian Shedd, who was then working for a public university, at a technology transfer event in 2017. They discussed collaborating on a CRADA, and although that specific agreement never came to fruition, Shedd and Presley kept in contact over the years.

Fast forward to 2024, Shedd, who is now the executive director of UTPB’s Office of Innovation and Commercialization, reached out to ORTA about the opportunity for UTPB to join the ARISE program. That initial chance conversation seven years ago turned into an impactful opportunity for NSA, UTPB, and the greater southwest Texas region, Presley said.

“It’s a testament to the idea that no interaction is too small: a brief run-in with a colleague can, years later, turn into a major collaboration,” she added.

UTPB prides itself on being a small school that thinks large and lives locally, according to Shedd.

“National security, cybersecurity, and infrastructure are all topics that are important to our region,” he said. “This partnership is unique for the university and provides an opportunity for students to get their hands on early stage technology.”

According to Shedd, the university’s business and computer science programs will start by performing market and intellectual property assessments. Eventually, they will participate in research and development to address some of the Agency’s mission problems.

“This partnership has been years in the making, and we’re excited to finally see it come to fruition,” Presley said. “I really can’t wait to see what the students at UTPB are able to achieve through this CRADA.”


NSA ORTA establishes partnerships with industry, academia, and other government agencies to help accelerate mission goals, advance science, foster innovation, and promote technology commercialization. Click here to learn more!

STEM Fest: Engineering Ideas Into Reality

Source: National Security Agency NSA

Join the National Cryptologic Museum for the 10th Annual STEM Fest! Explore a world of discovery where science, technology, engineering and math come together!

Get ready for hands-on exhibits, exciting activities and industry experts that will help spark curiosity and creativity!

The NCM is partnering with the Maryland STEM Festival for the 10th consecutive year. It’s a chance to explore the latest innovations in the STEM fields and have a family fun adventure! STEM Fest is free and open to the public.

When: November 9,, 2024 10am-4pm
Where: National Cryptologic Museum
8290 Colony Seven Rd, Annapolis Junction, MD 20701
 

Robots on the Plains: NSA Helps Native Students Engage in Cybersecurity Learning

Source: National Security Agency NSA

Last month, National Security Agency (NSA) affiliates traveled to North Dakota’s Turtle Mountain Indian Reservation to teach Native high school students about programming, cybersecurity, and robotics.

Dr. Adam Tagert from Research and Dr. Nathan BrownEagle from Cybersecurity attended NSA Day, the final day of the Sandia National Laboratory-sponsored camp at Turtle Mountain Community College (TMCC)—a private tribal land-grant community college founded by the Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians in 1972.

NSA’s diverse workforce, cybersecurity mission, and history of bringing the robots to Indian Country attracted the attention of the National Nuclear Security Administration and Sandia National Labs. Sandia then extended the invitation to NSA’s American Indian Alaska Native Employee Resource Group (AIAN ERG) to participate in the event with Tribal community colleges and universities.

NSA Day at the camp was included for students interested in future STEM or cybersecurity careers. TMCC has a strong focus in cybersecurity and is working towards accrediting a Bachelor of Science in Cybersecurity to add to their Associate of Applied Science program.

The first assignment of NSA Day at the camp was to program a set of robots to play soccer.

“It was inspiring to see students take a difficult challenge and the excitement that followed when they saw the robots move based on their commands and programming,” Tagert said, explaining that is the benefit of robotics. “It’s the ability to see the effect on the real world compared to changing something on a monitor.”

After a few soccer matches, where the students had the robots push a neon green foam ball into the goal, the NSA team performed a cyberattack on the robots to show that without cybersecurity, simple attacks, like a denial of service (DoS) can make cyber devices uncontrollable. A DoS is an event in which an attacker sends more information than the recipient can handle, which causes delays or missed commands.

The students then experimented by attacking each other’s robots and defending themselves with a mitigation that caused the robot to stop listening to commands over a set threshold. The students took to the final activity eagerly, which was more programming intensive than the soccer game and cybersecurity component.

This camp has appealed to Native youth in the past, even successfully attracting Native interns to Sandia National Labs over the past two summers.

“Hopefully, these students will be interested in applying for Stokes or other programs,” BrownEagle said. “Our opportunity to present just shows the impact of NSA reaching out to a broader demographic of STEM fair participants.”

BrownEagle added that a shortened version of the activity has also been presented at various national STEM conferences over the years.

“I’m grateful that Sandia recognized the value of Adam’s curriculum and invited us to bolster the region’s cybersecurity education for these Native students,” BrownEagle said.

“Remember Why You’re Here”: Mother of 9/11 Victim Visits Morrison Center Memorial

Source: National Security Agency NSA

FORT MEADE, Md. – “It shows you how fragile life is,” mother of Flight 93’s youngest victim said with tear-filled eyes at the sight of her 20-year old daughter’s photo and purse on display at the 9/11 memorial in the lobby of the Morrison Center on NSA/CSS Washington’s East Campus.
 
Earlier this year, Deborah “Debby” Borza donated to NSA the purse that her daughter carried on 11 September 2001. She was recently invited to the Agency to view this memorial on what would have been her daughter, Deora Bodley’s, 43rd birthday.

Debby Borza weeps at the sight of NSA’s Flight 93 memorial in memory of her daughter.

Borza and her partner, Gregory Linden, began their visit at the National Cryptologic Museum with a guided tour from the Center for Cryptologic History Chief John Tokar and a retired NSA employee and museum docent.

After a first-hand look into the Agency’s history, Borza and Linden boarded a van to East Campus to see the 9/11 memorial.
 
“What a great honor to have you here,” Deputy Director Wendy Noble said as she greeted them both upon their arrival.
 
Noble shared with Borza how much this memorial means to NSA.
 
“The reason we have it in the front of the building is especially for new employees, to remember why you’re here,” she said.
 
The project manager of the 9/11 memorial, and other members of the Morrison Center construction team were also present for the visit.
 
“A lot of folks that come and work here were born after 9/11,” the project manager said, sharing how the memorial helps the workforce relate to this tragic event in history.
 
 The co-facility manager and former Morrison Center construction manager, along with members of the Facility Management Team from East Campus, also got emotional and thanked Borza for her contribution.

Picture of Flight 93 victim Deora Bodley, and the purse she carried on 9/11 on display at the 9/11 memorial at NSA/CSS Washington’s Morrison Center.

The co-facility manager explained how Borza was instrumental in the Flight 93 memorial at NSA becoming a reality, and her visit brought it all together.
 
Borza was equally grateful for the time and hard work they put into the entire display, especially the piece honoring her daughter.
 
“To the gentlemen who built it, thank you,” she said. “Thank you for taking on that responsibility. This is amazing.”
 
The 9/11 memorial displays: an American flag from Shanksville, Pennsylvania; elevator tracks from the World Trade Center; limestone rubble and a partially melted laptop from the Pentagon; and Bodley’s purse, cleaned and preserved from the Flight 93 crash site.
 

A Day Etched Into Memory

 
On 11 September 2001, Borza’s daughter was entering her junior year as a French and child psychology major at Santa Clara University in California, and was returning to school after a visit with girlfriends on the East Coast. She had gone to the airport early that morning to accommodate her friend who had an early class. While Bodley was not scheduled to be on Flight 93 traveling from Newark International Airport to San Francisco, she was able to get a seat on standby.
 
Borza was at work when she got a tearful phone call from her daughter’s friend, saying that she had gotten on an earlier flight.
 
It was in that moment that Borza had an unsettling feeling, and went to a church across the street to pray. Borza recalled that she asked God, “Where is Deora?” and she heard a quiet voice respond, “She’s with me.”

Moments later, Borza got a call from the airline, and heard, “I’m sorry to inform you—” from the other line. Borza dropped the phone.
 

Debby Borza reads a quote at the 9/11 memorial.

Remembering and Honoring Her Daughter’s Legacy

 
Bodley dreamed of becoming a child psychologist, and was committed to community service, volunteering in high school, working with the America Reads program, and tutoring kids after school.
 
Since that phone call, Borza has dedicated her life to honoring her daughter and the other lives lost in Shanksville, and even relocated to Maryland to be closer to the crash site and to Washington D.C.
 
She has been a fixture in Congress and Shanksville since 2001 — working on memorial plans, committees, and legislation where she served on the board for Families of Flight 93 and the 9/11 National Memorial Trail.
 
“She’s the unofficial mayor of that place! Everybody knows her,” Tokar said as he accompanied Borza to the Flight 93 crash site.
 
Borza spent the day prior to the NSA visit at the Flight 93 memorial in Pennsylvania, watching the recent solar eclipse and commemorating her daughter’s birthday.
 
She was asked to speak to a school group that was scheduled to be at the Tower of Voices memorial that day to highlight history and take in the experience. There, Borza and the students made memories as they ate Oreos (her daughter’s favorite snack), and got to see a scientific wonder happen before their eyes.
 
“Being with those kids, I felt Deora closer than ever before,” Borza said.
 
The Tower of Voices, a 93-foot tall musical instrument holding 40 wind chimes, stands as a landmark feature near the entrance to the Flight 93 National Memorial, located in Somerset County, Pennsylvania.

NSA Deputy Director Wendy Noble with Debby Borza, mother of 9/11 victim, standing in front of the 9/11 memorial at NSA/CSS Washington’s East Campus.

The living memorial creates a set of forty tones (“voices”) to remember Bodley and the 39 others who died through their ongoing voices.

“Thank you for everything you’ve done,” said Ms. Noble, further recognizing Borza’s tireless work to help memorialize those who lost their lives 23 years ago.
 
Borza replied tearfully, “I did it for her.”
 
Before the afternoon concluded, Ms. Noble gave Borza her personal coin.
 
Borza recalls how the trip to the Agency to see the final piece of her daughter’s memorial was a fulfilling culmination to an emotional week, and before leaving Borza told the crowd, “Some people say ‘Never Forget,’ I like to say, ‘Remember.’ I know for sure, Deora’s very happy.”

History Today, June 6: The role of signals intelligence or ‘ULTRA’ on D-Day

Source: National Security Agency NSA

The term D-Day was a shorthand expression first used in World War I to denote the date an operation was to be launched. In the earlier war, officers also used H-HOUR and M-MINUTE, but these were seldom used in World War II. Because of the scope of the 1944 operation and the momentous stakes, in common parlance, “D-Day” has come to refer primarily to the landings in Normandy.

The Germans had occupied France since 1940. When the Americans entered the war in December 1941, U.S. strategic thinking called for an immediate landing in France in conjunction with our British allies, followed by an advance to liberate the country and then press on to Berlin. Britain’s high command argued against this course of action, pointing out, correctly, that the Germans were well dug in, American forces lacked experience in combat against the powerful foe, and neither country had yet assembled the reserve of men and materiel such an effort required.

As a consequence, the Allies battled the Germans in North Africa, Sicily, and Italy – but by spring 1944, the time had come to land in France and carry the battle to the German homeland. Hundreds of thousands of American, British, and Canadian men readied to land on five beaches in Normandy, France, to face well-prepared German defensive positions.

The planning for this operation, codenamed OVERLORD, was complex, but the strategic planning staff had an important asset — SIGINT. This was ULTRA, the product of cryptanalysis of high-grade enemy cryptosystems such as the now-famous ENIGMA machine. Crucial information also was derived from decrypts of reports written by the Japanese ambassador to Germany, who had toured the beachfronts of France in the autumn of 1943.
Those who study intelligence know that ULTRA gave planners access to copious amounts of information about the German weaponry emplaced along the beaches, the order of battle of the defensive units, and the standing orders given to the defenders.

Less well known but no less important was the information on German defensive mines in the English Channel. This was a vital factor, since Britain and the United States were transporting their combat units across the channel in hundreds of ships.

ULTRA provided a great deal of data on German mine laying. Some of it came from communications of the boats actually creating the minefield, some of it came from instructions to German ships about cleared areas for their sailing. The information included types of mines used, as well as boundaries for closed and open channels.

This information allowed the Allies to select mine-free routes for the ships carrying the landing parties and identify areas where minesweeping actions would be a priority.

The official historian of British COMINT in World War II wrote, “Largely with the assistance of SIGINT, though not without much tedious analysis of it . . ., the programme was reconstructed in considerable detail — a fact which proved to be of considerable importance for the success of the landings.”

In addition to ULTRA, U.S. ground forces had tactical COMINT personnel who accompanied deployed troops and provided intelligence from low-level German or Japanese communications.

The U.S. Navy also had tactical COMINT teams aboard ships in the Mediterranean and European Theaters of War, called the Y Service, a term borrowed from British usage. One of the primary missions of these teams was to provide warning of enemy air attacks and to jam German radio-controlled bombs.

Initially, the U.S. Navy had to borrow intercept operators from the U.S. Army or the Royal Navy. In early 1944, the commander of U.S. naval forces in Northwest African waters asked the Chief of Naval Operations to send twenty-four men for training in Y Service operations. He noted that the candidates should be of good intelligence, without family ties in Axis countries, wholly trustworthy, and be thoroughly fluent in idiomatic German; if any had a knowledge of German shorthand, that would be especially desirable.

In March two officers and ten enlisted men were dispatched from the U.S. to Europe for Y Service training, which was to be provided by the British admiralty.

As Allied forces prepared for Operation NEPTUNE, the naval phase of the Normandy landings, seven naval Y teams were deployed. Three of the teams had only British personnel; the other teams had mixed U.S. and UK personnel. It was felt that training alone was insufficient for success; the U.S. had to overcome lack of experience by integration of personnel with its ally.

During the D-Day landings and afterward, the Y teams undertook twenty-four-hour coverage. This began on June 5 and continued through June 18. As one later report put it, “. . . [I]n the case of the Normandy Operation, Y service proved to be of little assistance because of the general lack of enemy aircraft and naval surface craft in the face of overwhelming Allied surface and air power.”

The Y Service teams were disbanded in January 1945. By this time, the German naval and air forces were no longer a threat to U.S. and British movement of troops and support for them from the British Isles to France.

Today is the 80th anniversary of D-Day, still the largest amphibious attack conducted in the face of an armed enemy. The sacrifice in life by British, Canadian, and American troops was heavy on this day in 1944, but the successful landings truly marked the beginning of the end for Adolph Hitler and Nazism.

NSA and Universities Partnering to Advance Cybersecurity Research

Source: National Security Agency NSA

NSA Research invited leading university research institutions across the country to the National Cryptologic Museum for a day-long event to tackle the ongoing challenge of securing critical cyber systems.
 
The Laboratory for Advanced Cybersecurity Research sponsored the Science of Security (SoS) Virtual Institute (VI) kick-off meeting earlier this year. It was aimed at advancing foundational research in three key areas: Trusted Systems, Artificial Intelligence and Cybersecurity, and Defensive Mechanisms.
 
These three VIs facilitate collaboration of industry and academic communities with NSA research liaisons, and align with the Research Directorate’s mission to anticipate technological advances, prevent disruptive technology surprise, and partner to transition research into operational outcomes, according to Dr. Rita Bush, chief of the Laboratory for Advanced Cybersecurity Research.
 
Bush provided opening remarks and expressed her admiration of the SoS partnerships with academia.
 
“I am truly honored to welcome the university researchers to our latest version of the Science of Security program. SoS has a long history of sponsoring innovative unclassified research at great universities,” Bush said. “I’m so pleased that we’ve been able to continue this program, and introduce a new generation of students to the kinds of cybersecurity challenges that we face in protecting National Security Systems.”
 
In 2012, the Research Directorate began funding academic “lablets” focused on the development of a broad, self-sustaining community effort to advance the science of security. The lablets were small multi-disciplinary labs at universities across the country that perform cybersecurity, to underpin advances in cyber defense.
 
“Building these relationships is so important because the foundational research and results of the projects will help drive improvements in cybersecurity,” SoS Program Manager Shavon D. said. “The students at these institutions are working on hard research problems that align with our Agency’s strategic goals and with the interests of the Government as a whole.”
 
This year, lablets were replaced by VIs, a new model that will continue in the spirit of foundational research they established while also allowing projects to be added or retired as the knowledge in various topic areas advances.
 
Research advancements from each VI will be extensively documented and widely distributed through the SoS Virtual Organization (SoS VO), an online unclassified repository for SoS community awareness, directed toward the maturing of the scientific basis for security.
 
This year, the SoS team hosted principal investigators (school representatives) from Arizona State University, the International Computer Science Institute, University of Kansas, Ohio State University, Towson University, and Vanderbilt University. Their presentations addressed wide-ranging technical topics from the VIs including “Improving Safety and Security of Neural Networks” (AI and Cybersecurity), “Advancing Security and Privacy of Bluetooth IoT” (Trusted Systems), and “Neurosymbolic Autonomous Agents for Cyber-Defense” (Defensive Mechanisms.) There are currently 11 funded VI projects this year, including projects with Carnegie Mellon University, which was awarded a contract after the kickoff meeting.
 
“Our research universities are a national treasure, and I want you to be aware of the impact of your work and the work of Science of Security,” said Dr. Glenn L., Acting Technical Director, Laboratory for Cybersecurity Research, during his closing remarks.
 
Glenn shared how one of the sections in the White House’s Office of Science, Technology, and Policy 4-year Cybersecurity R&D Strategy was influenced by a Science of Security project out-brief. “Your work can have outsized impact; impact in ways that we didn’t initially imagine, informing a broad range of cybersecurity research.”
 
For more information about the SoS initiative and to view this year’s SoS-VI projects, please visit http://www.sos-vo.org/research#lablets.


Interested in learning more about joining NSA’s mission? Visit NSA.gov/Careers for more information. 
 

NSA/CSS Employees Donate More Than $2M for 2023 Combined Federal Campaign

Source: National Security Agency NSA

The 2023 Combined Federal Campaign (CFC) concluded on January 12, 2024, with National Security Agency (NSA)/Central Security Service (CSS) affiliate contributions exceeded NSA’s goal of $1.9 million with over $2 million donated to 1,398 charities.

The CFC, led by the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM), enables federal employees and retirees to support people and communities in need across the country and around the world.

It is the world’s largest and most successful annual workplace charity campaign, according to Barry Boseman, chief of State and Local Affairs.
NSA led donations in the mid-Atlantic region, which includes four states, Washington D.C., and 1,200 participating government agencies, Boseman said. The Department of Defense (DoD) total for the 2023 CFC was over $8.5 million, of which NSA contributed over 20%, and the nationwide total was $68.3 million.

“I’m incredibly proud of the contributions that our workforce made during this year’s campaign,” said Gen. Tim Haugh, Commander, USCYBERCOM, Director, NSA/Chief, CSS. “NSA remains committed to giving back to our local communities during the CFC and beyond.”

“The theme for the 2023 CFC was ‘Give Happy,’ as the CFC connected giving with happiness, showing that when federal employees give together, they are happier,” said Veronica Maylish Beckenstrater, NSA’s CFC program manager for the 2023 campaign.

William “Roy” Surrett, NSA’s lead CFC senior advocate, agreed. “Thank you again for ‘giving happy’ to important causes like helping communities recover from disasters, supporting military families, ensuring education for all, and more,” he said. “There is no better feeling than to help those in need here in our local area, across our Nation, and around the world.”

“The workforce’s dedication was vital to the success of the campaign and will bring help and hope to thousands of people as monetary and volunteer pledges go to support the missions of participating charities,” Maylish Beckenstrater said.

Keyworkers and senior advocates distributed marketing materials, spoke at town halls, and hosted events, including charity fairs, chili cook-offs, pet contests, painting parties, and bingo games to encourage the workforce to donate to causes that mean the most to them, she explained.

“It was innovative ideas like these that helped NSA exceed its goal this year and to show the community we care,” Maylish Beckenstrater added. “I can’t wait to see our workforce band together for next year’s campaign.”


Interested in learning more about joining NSA’s mission? Visit NSA.gov/Careers for more information. 
 

What Is Blue Carbon?

Source: International Atomic Energy Agency – IAEA

Sediment that accumulates in the seagrasses, mangroves and marshes can be analysed to help indicate changes in the environment over periods of time, ranging from the past few years to millions of years ago. The capacity of vegetated coastal ecosystems to sequester and store carbon in their sediments can be measured by nuclear and isotopic techniques.

The IAEA Marine Environment Laboratories in Monaco use these elements to determine the rates at which organic carbon accumulates in marine sediments using sediment core samples from vegetated coastal ecosystems. Sediment cores are collected by using long plastic tubes that during sampling are able to preserve the layers of sediment accumulated over time.

The naturally occurring radioactive isotope lead-210 (210Pb), in combination with some artificial radionuclides such as caesium-137 (137Cs) are used to determine the sedimentation rates in the sediments at timescales of decades – up to around 100 years, a period during which human induced impacts on the environment have dramatically increased.

These techniques encompass radiochemical separation and measurements by alpha and gamma spectrometry adapted to each isotope. This is then combined with the measurement of organic carbon contents and its isotopes along the sedimentary record by mass spectrometry methods to assess the organic carbon stocks and burial rates.

From Preparedness to Resilience: The Role of the IAEA in Nuclear and Radiological Emergency Response

Source: International Atomic Energy Agency – IAEA

The IAEA’s Incident and Emergency Centre plays a vital role in preparing and responding to potential nuclear or radiological emergencies worldwide. (Photo: D. Calma/IAEA)

Ahead of the International Day for Disaster Risk Reduction on 13 October, we look at the role played by the IAEA’s unique Incident and Emergency Centre in preparing and responding to potential nuclear or radiological emergencies.

The centre is staffed by 29 permanent experts with over 200 staff on standby in case of a major nuclear or radiological emergency, irrespective of the cause.

The centre remains operational 24/7, ready to spring into full operational mode if a report is received and meets established criteria, such as the declaration of an emergency at a nuclear power plant.

The centre is ready to respond and inform Member States and the public in any scenario that may be relevant for nuclear safety and security.  For example, on 1 January this year, at 07:10 UTC, a magnitude 7.6 earthquake struck Japan’s Ishikawa Prefecture. Just over an hour later, the Emergency Response Manager at the IAEA received a message via the Agency’s Unified System for Information Exchange in Incidents and Emergencies (USIE): six of Japan’s nuclear power plants had potentially been affected. Fortunately, no abnormalities were reported, detailed inspections were carried out by Japan to ensure that no plant functions had been compromised or damaged. At midday that day, an update was received from Japan that all nuclear power plants in the country were operating normally. This message was posted on USIE, and countries received the information within seconds.  The IAEA also promptly issued an update via social media, reassuring the public that it was in contact with Japanese authorities, there was no cause for concern, and monitoring would continue.

This prompt notification, proactive dissemination of information, and continuous communication with the national authorities — even in the absence of public safety impacts, as in the example above — exemplify best practices in disaster risk reduction. These lessons have been honed through responses to past emergencies, such as the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident.

“Over 1500 users from 173 Member States and 21 international organizations now rely on the IAEA’s platforms and systems for prompt notification and assistance in a nuclear emergency. Over the years, the IEC has been able to build up an agile, responsive system which can respond at short notice to any event,” said Carlos Torres Vidal, Director of the IAEA’s Incident and Emergency Centre.

While major nuclear accidents are very rare, the potential for incidents or emergencies remains — especially as radiation sources are used in a variety of contexts, from medicine to industry.

For example, earlier this year in Liberia, a radioactive source was discovered in a stormwater drain at the John F. Kennedy Medical Centre, the country’s largest hospital. Prompt intervention by the IAEA prevented a potential radiological incident, allowing the hospital to continue its operations without disruption. Read the full story.

Disasters can also compound one another: for instance, an earthquake may hinder efforts to respond to a nuclear emergency. Identifying, classifying, and preparing for swift action in response to different hazard scenarios is critical. Like pandemics and natural disasters, nuclear and radiological emergencies recognize no borders, amplifying the need for international coordination and information sharing.

A row of emergency response fire trucks stand ready for action as part of the national preparedness exercise “Valahia” in Romania in October 2023. (Photo: C. Torres Vidal/IAEA)

The IAEA’s Role in Global Preparedness

The IAEA’s Incident and Emergency Centre (IEC) plays a pivotal role in helping countries fulfil their obligations under the international conventions on nuclear accidents. These conventions were established in the aftermath of the 1986 Chornobyl Nuclear Power Plant accident, when the world recognized the need for a robust international framework for cooperation in the event of nuclear emergencies.

The Convention on Early Notification of a Nuclear Accident ensures that countries rapidly share relevant information about nuclear accidents or radiological emergencies, minimizing the potential for transboundary radiological consequences. The Convention on Assistance in the Case of a Nuclear Accident or Radiological Emergency facilitates cooperation between countries and the IAEA to provide timely assistance during an emergency, aiming to protect lives, property and the environment.

Established in 2005, the IEC serves as the global focal point for preparedness, event reporting, information sharing, and coordinated response to nuclear and radiological emergencies, regardless of their origin.

Coordinating Global Responses

At the heart of the IEC’s work is global coordination. Under the emergency conventions, the IEC mobilizes international experts and coordinates in-house IAEA efforts in preparedness and response. It also works closely with other international organizations, such as the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), World Health Organization (WHO), and World Meteorological Organization (WMO), to support a coordinated response when required.

The IEC provides 24/7 assistance to countries facing nuclear or radiological events, including security-related threats. Its central platform, the Unified System for Information Exchange in Incidents and Emergencies (USIE), allows countries to notify the IAEA and the international community of emergencies confidentially and securely. While mandatory reporting is required for emergencies with potential transboundary impacts, countries are encouraged to report smaller events as well, even if they pose no immediate public safety risk but may cause public concern.

Through USIE, countries can access other vital IAEA tools, such as the International Radiation Monitoring Information System (IRMIS) for visualizing radiation monitoring data, as well as assessment and prognosis tools. These tools provide emergency managers with critical insights about the potential progression of a nuclear accident, allowing them to make informed decisions and take prompt protective actions.

IRMIS helps emergency managers decide the right protective actions during a nuclear emergency by showing radiation data compared to pre-calculated safety levels (Operational Interventional Levels, or OILs). For example, high radiation levels in a specific area might mean evacuation or sheltering is needed. This information is displayed using colour codes that clearly indicate the proper action, like evacuating affected areas, or asking people to shelter in place.

The Reactor Assessment Tool allows the IAEA to explain the status of nuclear facilities, like power reactors, using simple language and color-coded diagrams. It receives safety data from IAEA counterparts in Member States, helping the IAEA send clear, timely updates to all countries and the public about the emergency situation.

The IEC also maintains a Response and Assistance Network (RANET) made up of States Parties to the Convention on Assistance in the Case of a Nuclear Accident or Radiological Emergency that have identified and registered in RANET national assistance capabilities consisting of qualified experts, equipment and materials that could be made available to assist another State.

Collaboration with Other Organizations

In addition to its in-house tools, the IEC collaborates with other organizations that provide essential data during emergencies. For example, the WMO offers atmospheric dispersion predictions based on real-time meteorological data, while the WHO is ready to engage specialised medical capabilities in Member States to provide assistance in cases of injuries caused by the improper use of radiation sources. This cooperation ensures that countries have access to relevant information to respond effectively in an emergency, from weather patterns to support in mitigating the consequences of nuclear or radiological emergencies. In fact, the IEC provides the Secretariat for the Inter-Agency Committee on Radiological and Nuclear Emergencies (IACRNE), which coordinates the arrangements of all these organizations for preparing for, and responding to, a nuclear or radiological incident or emergency.

Ensuring Preparedness

Preparedness is essential in ensuring that the impacts from a nuclear emergency can be adequately mitigated. The IEC plays a key role in strengthening national preparedness by providing guidance and training for a range of professionals from around the world, including emergency planners, responders, regulatory staff, and public information officers.

The centre also conducts Emergency Preparedness Review (EPREV) missions, which help countries evaluate and strengthen their national capabilities to respond to nuclear and radiological emergencies, aligning with international standards.

Nuclear accidents are rare, partly due to the robust safety and emergency preparedness regime in place globally. The IAEA’s Incident and Emergency Centre, through its coordination efforts, training programmes, and international partnerships, plays a crucial role in maintaining this safety net. By fostering international cooperation and ensuring readiness at all levels, the IEC helps mitigate risks, ensuring that even in the face of disaster, effective responses are in place to protect lives and the environment.

Update 254 – IAEA Director General Statement on Situation in Ukraine

Source: International Atomic Energy Agency – IAEA

Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP) has restored its connection to a 150 kilovolt (kV) power line that could be used as a back-up option for the plant, although the supplies of electricity needed for reactor cooling and other essential functions remain fragile, Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said today.

The 150 kV line was reportedly damaged in shelling late last month, further limiting the potential availability of power supplies for the ZNPP as this line connects the site to the switchyard of the nearby Zaporizhzhya Thermal Power Plant. However, the IAEA team stationed at the ZNPP was informed this week that the repairs had been completed and the line was once again available, if needed.

During the military conflict, the ZNPP has been relying on two power lines – one 750 kV and one 330 kV – for off-site electricity but both have suffered repeated disconnections as a result of the fighting, underlining the potential importance of any additional source of electricity. Before the conflict, the ZNPP had ten power lines available.

During the past week, the IAEA team has continued to hear explosions, including some blasts close to the ZNPP, although no damage to the plant was reported.

The IAEA team conducted regular walkdowns across the ZNPP, including by the sprinkler ponds and in the turbine halls of two units, and observed ongoing maintenance activities of one main transformer as well as testing of one emergency diesel generator pertaining to part of the safety system.

The IAEA teams present at the Khmelnytskyy, Rivne and South Ukraine NPPs and the Chornobyl site reported that nuclear safety and security is being maintained despite the effects of the ongoing conflict, including air raid alarms for several days over the past week.

At the Rivne NPP, reactor unit 2 has been reconnected to the grid following planned outage. Following an air raid alert, the IAEA team deployed at Khmelnytskyy NPP took shelter in the morning of 7 October.