Source: United States Attorneys General
The Justice Department announced today that it has entered into a settlement agreement with the Orange County, California, District Attorney on the use of custodial informants at the Orange County jails in California. The agreement resolves the department’s civil investigation finding that custodial informant activity by the Orange County District Attorney’s Office (OCDA) from 2007 through 2016 with the Orange County Sheriff’s Department (OCSD) violated criminal defendants’ right to counsel under the Sixth Amendment and right to due process of law under the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Under the agreement, the District Attorney agrees to continue implementing reforms to protect against misuse of custodial informants at the Orange County jails and to disclose to criminal defendants exculpatory evidence about custodial informants, in accordance with constitutional guarantees to a fair trial and right to counsel. Specifically, the District Attorney agrees to maintain changes to OCDA policies, training, document and information systems and internal audits, as well as to engage with representatives of the Orange County criminal justice system on additional improvements. The department will also have full and direct access to independently validate that the reforms have taken hold at OCDA and are achieving their intended results.
“Under the Sixth Amendment, law enforcement cannot use custodial informants as their agents to elicit incriminating statements from defendants represented by counsel,” said Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. “We commend the District Attorney and his staff for initiating corrective action at OCDA to comply with constitutional requirements. The District Attorney’s proactive efforts, together with today’s agreement, will not only protect the constitutional rights of individual defendants; they will also help restore the public’s confidence in the fundamental fairness of the criminal justice system in Orange County.”
The out-of-court agreement is the result of extensive cooperation from the District Attorney and members of OCDA following the release of the department’s investigative findings in October 2022. The agreement is also the result of systemic improvements initiated by the District Attorney, including suspending the use of custodial informants without his express, prior approval in 2016.
The department opened its investigation into OCDA and OCSD in 2016. The evidence uncovered by the department revealed that custodial informants in the Orange County Jail system acted as agents of law enforcement to elicit incriminating statements from defendants represented by counsel and that, for years, Orange County sheriff deputies maintained and concealed systems to track, manage and reward those custodial informants. The evidence also revealed that Orange County prosecutors failed to seek out and disclose exculpatory information regarding custodial informants to defense counsel.
The Civil Rights Division’s Special Litigation Section conducted the investigation pursuant to 34 U.S.C. § 12601. The statute prohibits state and local governments from engaging in a pattern or practice of conduct by law enforcement officers that deprives individuals of rights protected by the Constitution or federal law. The department’s negotiations with the Orange County Sheriff on remedial measures at OCSD are ongoing.
Since January 2021, the division has opened 12 investigations into law enforcement agencies. The section is enforcing 15 agreements with law enforcement agencies and two post-judgment orders. The department also reached a court enforceable agreement with Louisville and Minneapolis to resolve its findings. Both are pending review by the court.
The department’s investigative findings from October 2022 can be found here.
Information about the Civil Rights Division is available at www.justice.gov/crt.